This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-08-24 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| Likewise, we cannot give credence to petitioner's claim that respondents were fixed term employees. Petitioner's reliance on our ruling in Philippine Village Hotel v. National Labor Relations Commission[19] is misplaced because the facts in the said case are not in all fours with the case at bar. In said case, the employees were hired only for a one-month period and their employment contracts were never renewed. In the instant case, respondents' original employment contracts were renewed four times. In the last instance, their contracts were extended despite the cessation of petitioner's alleged transaction with Glory Japan. Thus, respondents were continuously under the employ of petitioner, performing the same duties and responsibilities, from July 6, 1998 to May 25, 1999. | |||||