Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 156208 2014-06-30	NPC DRIVERS v. NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION BRION, J.
In Session Delights Ice Cream & Fast Foods v. Court of Appeals,[113] we explained that, pursuant to our ruling in Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals,[114] a final decision becomes a judgment for money from which consequence flows the payment of legal interest of 12% in case of delay. We clarified in BPI Employees Union-Metro Manila v. Bank of the Philippine Islands,[115] that the payment of legal interest of 12% is a "natural consequence of a final judgment."[116] Thus, we held in Gonzales v. Solid Cement Corporation[.][117] that the principle of immutability of judgment is not affected.
	GR No. 198423 2012-10-23	EN BANC LEO A. GONZALES v. SOLID CEMENT CORPORATION BRION, J.
In the case of BPI Employees Union Metro Manila and Zenaida Uy v. Bank of the Philippine Islands and Bank of the Philippine Islands v. BPI Employees Union Metro Manila and Zenaida Uy,[21] the Court ruled that in computing backwages, salary increases from the time of dismissal until actual reinstatement, and benefits not yet granted at the time of dismissal are excluded. Hence, we cannot fault the CA for finding that the NLRC committed grave abuse of discretion in awarding the salary differential amounting to P617,517.48 and the 13th month pay differentials amounting to P51,459.48 that accrued subsequent to Gonzales' dismissal.