This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2008-12-18 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| Additionally, petitioners claim that in Knecht v. Court of Appeals[76] and Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals (Coca-Cola),[77] this Court ruled that the absence of the element of reliance by a party on the representation of another does not negate the principle of estoppel. Those cases are, however, not on all fours with and cannot be applied to this case. | |||||
|
2004-11-10 |
YNARES-SATIAGO, J. |
||||
| After a careful perusal of the records, we find no reason to disturb this finding of fact by the Court of Appeals, sufficiently supported as it is, by the evidence on record.[17] | |||||