This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2010-07-26 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| First, the testimony of Ambrosio cannot be considered as self-serving evidence. The phrase "self-serving evidence" is a concept which has a well-defined judicial meaning. Hernandez v. Court of Appeals[26] clarified what self-serving evidence is and what it is not, thus: The common objection known as "self-serving" is not correct because almost all testimonies are self-serving. The proper basis for objection is "hearsay" (Wenke, Making and Meeting Objections, 69). | |||||