You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. PAUL BANDIN Y NARCISO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2000-03-21
BELLOSILLO, J.
Moreover, we held in one case that chemical analysis is not an indispensable prerequisite to establish whether a certain substance offered in evidence is a prohibited drug. The ability to recognize these drugs can be acquired without any knowledge of chemistry to such an extent that the testimony of a witness on the point may be entitled to great weight. Such technical knowledge is not required, and the degree of familiarity of a witness with such drugs only affects the weight and not the competency of his testimony.[21] Manikx