This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2000-03-30 |
DAVIDE JR., C.J. |
||||
| Anent the first assignment of error, when an accused challenges his identification by witnesses, he, in effect, attacks their credibility.[33] It is settled that when the issue of credibility of witnesses is involved, appellate courts will generally not disturb the findings of the trial court considering that the latter is in a better position to decide the question, having heard the witnesses themselves and observed their deportment and manner of testifying during trial, unless certain facts of value have been plainly overlooked, which if considered, might affect the result of the case.[34] | |||||