Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 197363 2013-06-26	PEOPLE v. ROMAN ZAFRA Y SERRANO LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
It has been ruled, in a long line of cases,[32] that "absence of external signs of physical injuries does not negate rape."[33] The doctrine is thus well-entrenched in our jurisprudence, and the Court of Appeals correctly applied it.[34]
	GR No. 186463 2012-11-14	PEOPLE v. WILLIAM MANGUNE Y DEL ROSARIO LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
This Court, in a long line of cases,[31] has ruled that "the absence of external signs of physical injuries does not negate rape."[32] The doctrine is thus well-entrenched in our jurisprudence, and the Court of Appeals correctly applied it.[33]
	GR No. 113518 2000-01-25	PEOPLE v. ESTEBAN ARLEE ALSO KNOWN AS 'BOY ISING' PURISIMA, J.
In affirming the judgment of the court of origin convicting accused-appellant, this Court is mindful of the doctrine that when a woman says that she has been raped, she says, in effect, all that is necessary to show that she had indeed been raped, and if her testimony meets the test of credibility, as in the case under consideration, the rapist may be adjudged guilty solely on that basis.[48]