This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2012-06-13 |
DEL CASTILLO, J. |
||||
| Equitable argues that SSPI cannot assert a right against the bank based on the undelivered checks.[54] It cites provisions from the Negotiable Instruments Law and the case of Development Bank of Rizal v. Sima Wei[55] to argue that a payee, who did not receive the check, cannot require the drawee bank to pay it the sum stated on the checks. | |||||