This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2014-02-18 |
ABAD, J. |
||||
| The case of Nogales v. People[28] shows the extent to which the State can regulate materials that serve no other purpose than satisfy the market for violence, lust, or pornography.[29] The Court weighed the property rights of individuals against the public welfare. Private property, if containing pornographic materials, may be forfeited and destroyed. Likewise, engaging in sexual acts privately through internet connection, perceived by some as a right, has to be balanced with the mandate of the State to eradicate white slavery and the exploitation of women. | |||||
|
2008-11-27 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| This is a Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition under Rule 65 of the Revised Rules of Court seeking to nullify and set aside the Decision[1] dated 7 November 2006 and Resolution[2] dated 14 June 2007 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 91080 entitled, Rolando L. Magno v. Lizabeth Carreon. The Court of Appeals reversed the Decision promulgated on 3 June 2005[3] and Order issued 22 August 2005[4] of the Office of the Ombudsman (Ombudsman) in OMB-ADM-0-00-0148 and denied the Omnibus Motion to Intervene and for Reconsideration of the Ombudsman in CA-G.R. SP No. 91080. The Ombudsman, in OMB-ADM-0-00-0148, dismissed from service private respondent Rolando L. Magno (Magno), Schools Division Superintendent of the Department of Education, Parañaque City Division, and Co-Chairman of the Parañaque City School Board (PCSB), for Grave Misconduct. | |||||