This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2012-07-25 |
SERENO, J. |
||||
| The instant Rule 45 Petition assails the Decision[1] and Resolution[2] or the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-GR. CV No. 80223. The CA reversed and set aside the Adjudication[3] or the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 93, Quezon City (the Rehabilitation Court) in Civil Case No. Q-02-010, which had approved the Second Amended Rehabilitation Plan of petitioners Situs Development Corporation, Daily Supermarket, Inc. and Color Lithographic Press, Inc. (collectively, petitioners or petitioner corporations) over the objections of respondents Asiatrust Bank (Asiatrust), Allied Banking Corporation (Allied Bank) and Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company (Metrobank). Respondent Cameron Granville II Asset Management, Inc. (Cameron), a Special Purpose Vehicle, was the transferee of Metrobank's rights, title and interest in the instant case. | |||||
|
2007-06-08 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| Petitioner impugns the reasoning of the CA and argues that Nidoy is not apropos because the structure his family is occupying is not an apartment unit, but a mere makeshift shack which he rents for P1,200.00 a month, compared to regular apartments in Paranaque City which fetch a minimum monthly rent of P5,000.00. He cites B.E. San Diego, Inc. v. Court of Appeals[20] as the applicable ruling, for it is imbued with the liberal spirit of P.D. No. 1517. | |||||