Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 174251 2010-12-15	RAUL PALOMATA v. NESTOR COLMENARES DEL CASTILLO, J.
All these circumstances support the trial and the appellate court's refusal to give the investigation reports much weight and credence. This Court will not disturb the conclusions arrived at by the CAR and the appellate court when these are well-supported by the evidence.[40]
	GR NO. 144071 2005-08-25	SPS. ALEJANDRO A. JOSON AND LOURDES SAMSON v. REYNALDO MENDOZA CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
Recall that Malate v. Court of Appeals[15] guides us that:In appeals in agrarian cases, the only function required of the Court of Appeals is to determine whether the findings of fact of the Court of Agrarian Relations are supported by substantial evidence. And substantial evidence has been defined to be such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion and its absence is not shown by stressing that there is contrary evidence on record, direct or circumstantial, and where the findings of fact of the agrarian court are supported by substantial evidence, such findings are conclusive and binding on the appellate court.