This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2008-10-17 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| Before this Court are three consolidated Rule 45 petitions all involving the issue of whether the real and hypothecary doctrine may be invoked by the shipowner in relation to the loss of cargoes occasioned by the sinking of M/V P. Aboitiz on 31 October 1980. The petitions filed by Aboitiz Shipping Corporation (Aboitiz) commonly seek the computation of its liability in accordance with the Court's pronouncement in Aboitiz Shipping Corporation v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd.[1] (hereafter referred to as "the 1993 GAFLAC case"). | |||||
|
2007-08-24 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| In its Motion for Reconsideration,[1] petitioner seeks the reversal of this Court's Decision[2] dated May 2, 2006, and the referral of this case to the Court En Banc allegedly due to its inconsistency with the rulings in Monarch Insurance Co., Inc. v. Court of Appeals[3] and Aboitiz Shipping Corporation v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd.[4] (GAFLAC). | |||||
|
2000-02-09 |
DE LEON, JR., J. |
||||
| It would be noted that I have not approved the renewal of your contract which will all depend on the outcome of this request."[9] In compliance therewith[10], petitioner issued Duty Detail Order No. 00446[11] on August 1, 1991 relieving private respondent and another lady security guard, Digna Suelan, of their assignment in VM Condominium II effective August 2, 1991 for reassignment to other units or detachments where vacancy exists. | |||||