You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. TERESITA S. SINGSON

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2012-02-06
BRION, J.
The petitioner prays for her acquittal for the prosecution's failure to prove the element of deceit. She argues that her actions prior to, during and after the filing of the estafa case against her negated deceit, ill-motive and/or bad faith to abscond with her obligation to the private complainant. She cites the cases of People v. Singson[6] and People v. Ojeda[7] where the Court acquitted the accused for the failure of the prosecution to prove the element of deceit.
2002-09-17
QUISUMBING, J.
the poor quality of the tires supplied by Sia. Appellant, in praying for acquittal, relies heavily on our ruling in People vs. Singson,[17] where we held that: Although in the case of bouncing check under BP Blg. 22, failure of the drawer to deposit the amount necessary to cover his checks within three days from notice of dishonor shall be prima facie evidence of fraud or deceit, under Article 315 of the Revised Penal Code,