This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-06-08 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| With regards to Casalla's being earlier declared an "ABSENTEE AWARDEE," this supposed status of hers was found inaccurate and not in conformity with the real circumstances by the Awards and Arbitration Committee, NHA, through Resolution No. 031 dated September 13, 1998.[18] In affirming the disqualification of petitioner, the CA relied on our ruling in Nidoy v. Court of Appeals[19] that Presidential Decree (P.D.) No. 1517 (Urban Land Reform Program) is not intended for apartment dwellers, least of all deforciants on the property. The CA held that petitioner was a mere tenant of one of the apartments on the subject lot, and that his continued possession of the apartment became illegal when he failed to vacate the same in accordance with the terms of the Kasunduan. | |||||