Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

VICTOR DE JESUS v. CA

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 196278 2015-06-17	CE CASECNAN WATER v. PROVINCE OF NUEVA ECIJA DEL CASTILLO, J.
Further, the Court in City of Manila, citing J. M. Tuason & Co., Inc. v. Jaramillo,[29] De Jesus v. Court of Appeals,[30] as well as the more recent cases of Galang, Jr. v. Hon. Judge Geronimo[31] and Bulilis v. Nuez[32] held that:Consistent with the above pronouncement, this Court has held as early as the case of J.M. Tuason & Co., Inc. v. Jaramillo, et al. that 'if a case may be appealed to a particular court or judicial tribunal or body, then said court or judicial tribunal or body has jurisdiction to issue the extraordinary writ of certiorari, in aid of its appellate jurisdiction.' This principle was affirmed in De Jesus v. Court of Appeals, where the Court stated that 'a court may issue a writ of certiorari in aid of its appellate jurisdiction if said court has jurisdiction to review, by appeal or writ of error, the final orders or decisions of the lower court.' The rulings in J.M. Tuason and De Jesus were reiterated in the more recent cases of Galang, Jr. v. Geronimo and Bulilis v. Nuez.
	GR No. 175723 2014-02-04	CITY OF MANILA v. CARIDAD H. GRECIA-CUERDO PERALTA, J.
Consistent with the above pronouncement, this Court has held as early as the case of J.M. Tuason & Co., Inc. v. Jaramillo, et al.[29] that "if a case may be appealed to a particular court or judicial tribunal or body, then said court or judicial tribunal or body has jurisdiction to issue the extraordinary writ of certiorari, in aid of its appellate jurisdiction."[30] This principle was affirmed in De Jesus v. Court of Appeals,[31] where the Court stated that "a court may issue a writ of certiorari in aid of its appellate jurisdiction if said court has jurisdiction to review, by appeal or writ of error, the final orders or decisions of the lower court."[32] The rulings in J.M. Tuason and De Jesus were reiterated in the more recent cases of Galang, Jr. v. Geronimo[33] and Bulilis v. Nuez.[34]
	GR No. 188775 2011-08-24	CENON R. TEVES v. PEOPLE PEREZ, J.
Settled is the rule that criminal culpability attaches to the offender upon the commission of the offense, and from that instant, liability appends to him until extinguished as provided by law, and that the time of filing of the criminal complaint (or Information, in proper cases) is material only for determining prescription.[22] The crime of bigamy was committed by petitioner on 10 December 2001 when he contracted a second marriage with Edita. The finality on 27 June 2006 of the judicial declaration of the nullity of his previous marriage to Thelma cannot be made to retroact to the date of the bigamous marriage.
	GR No. 192793 2011-02-22	FESTO R. GALANG v. RAMIRO R. GERONIMO PERALTA, J.
Interpreting the phrase "in aid of its appellate jurisdiction," the Court held in J.M. Tuason & Co., Inc. v. Jaramillo, et al.[6] that if a case may be appealed to a particular court or judicial tribunal or body, then said court or judicial tribunal or body has jurisdiction to issue the extraordinary writ of certiorari, in aid of its appellate jurisdiction. This was reiterated in De Jesus v. Court of Appeals,[7] where the Court stated that a court may issue a writ of certiorari in aid of its appellate jurisdiction if said court has jurisdiction to review, by appeal or writ of error, the final orders or decisions of the lower court.