You're currently signed in as:
User

SANYO PHILIPPINES WORKERS UNION-PSSLU LOCAL CHAPTER NO. 109 v. POTENCIANO S. CANIZARES

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2012-10-10
BRION, J.
Fernandez explains that his complaint does not involve any "unresolved grievances arising from the interpretation or implementation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement [nor] from the interpretation or enforcement of company personnel policies[.]"[22] As he never referred his claim to the grievance machinery, there is no "unresolved grievance" to speak of. His complaint involves a claim for compensation and damages which is outside the voluntary arbitrator's jurisdiction under Article 261. Further, only disputes involving the union and the company shall be referred to the grievance machinery and to voluntary arbitration, as the Court held in Sanyo Philippines Workers Union-PSSLU v. CaƱizares[23] and Silva v. CA.[24]