This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-01-28 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
| In support of its contentions, La Savoie cites the following portion of this court's discussion in Araneta v. Court of Appeals:[92] | |||||
|
2015-01-28 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
| It must be stressed that the SEC had earlier ordered the suspension of all actions for claims against Alemar's in order that all the assets of said petitioner could be inventoried and kept intact for the purpose of ascertaining an equitable scheme of distribution among its creditors.[98] (Emphasis supplied) | |||||