This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-06-30 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Respondents are of the view that this petition for certiorari is improper since they are not tribunals, boards or officers exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions. Petitioner, however, counters that in enacting Ordinance Nos. SP-2095 and SP-2235, the Quezon City Council exercised quasi-judicial function because the ordinances ruled against the property owners who must pay the SHT and the garbage fee, exacting from them funds for basic essential public services that they should not be held liable. Even if a Rule 65 petition is improper, petitioner still asserts that this Court, in a number of cases like in Rosario v. Court of Appeals,[13] has taken cognizance of an improper remedy in the interest of justice. | |||||