This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-08-13 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Citing Dytiapco v. Civil Service Commission,[23] the Court of Appeals held that Gungon's application for terminal leave and his subsequent acceptance of terminal leave benefits could not be construed as an abandonment of his claim for reinstatement or indicative of his intent to voluntarily sever his employment with the government considering that Gungon had appealed his case to the CSC and had a pending motion for reconsideration of CSC Resolution No. 982525 before he received his terminal leave benefits. Gungon's appeal to the CSC and then to the Court of Appeals strongly indicated his desire to be reinstated, not separated from the government service. | |||||