Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 190253 2014-06-11	JUAN TRAJANO v. UNIWIDE SALES WAREHOUSE CLUB BRION, J.
Indeed, we introduced in Eternal Gardens Memorial Park v. Court of Appeals[57] the principle of judicial courtesy to justify the suspension of the proceedings before the lower court even without an injunctive writ or order from the higher court. In that case, we pronounced that "[d]ue respect for the Supreme Court and practical and ethical considerations should have prompted the appellate court to wait for the final determination of the petition [for certiorari] before taking cognizance of the case and trying to render moot exactly what was before this [C]ourt."[58] We subsequently reiterated the concept of judicial courtesy in Joy Mart Consolidated Corp. v. Court of Appeals.[59]
	GR NO. 156128 2005-06-09	RAMONITO TANTOY v. ZEUS C. ABROGAR QUISUMBING, J.
On the second issue, petitioner cites Joy Mart Consolidated Corporation v. Court of Appeals,[10] and contends that the trial court could no longer dissolve the writ because the matter in dispute has already been elevated to the Court of Appeals.
	GR No. 156128 2005-05-09	RAMONITO TANTOY v. ZEUS C. ABROGAR QUISUMBING, J.
On the second issue, petitioner cites Joy Mart Consolidated Corporation v. Court of Appeals,[10] and contends that the trial court could no longer dissolve the writ because the matter in dispute has already been elevated to the Court of Appeals.