Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 196219 2014-07-30	SPS. MAURICIO M. TABINO AND LEONILA DELA CRUZ-TABINO v. LAZARO M. TABINO DEL CASTILLO, J.
On April 4, 2008, a Decision[18] was rendered in Civil Case No. 85043, as follows: The only issue to be resolved in this action to recover possession of the subject property is the question on who is entitled to the physical or material possession of the premises. In ejectment cases, the word "possession" means nothing more than physical possession, not legal possession, in the sense contemplated in civil law.
	GR No. 154042 2011-04-11	JOSE T. TUBOLA v. SANDIGANBAYAN CARPIO MORALES, J.
That a magistrate may propound clarificatory questions to secure a full and clear understanding of the facts in the case is not proscribed.[35]
	GR No. 172608 2007-02-06	PEOPLE v. BERNARD MAPALO CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
[49] G.R. No. 85043, 16 June 1992, 210 SCRA 1.