You're currently signed in as:
User

RTC JUDGE CAMILO E. TAMIN v. CA

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2009-04-07
TINGA, J.
If we examine the particular franchises of respondents, it is readily apparent that Congress has especially invested the NTC with certain powers with respect to their broadcast operations. Both R.A. No. 7477[59] and R.A. No. 7582[60] require the grantee "to secure from the [NTC] the appropriate permits and licenses for its stations," barring the private respondents from "using any frequency in the radio spectrum without having been authorized by the [NTC]." At the same time, both laws provided that "[the NTC], however, shall not unreasonably withhold or delay the grant of any such authority."
2008-09-03
CORONA, J.
Under the cadastral system, the government initiates the proceedings for the compulsory registration of lands within a stated area by filing a petition in court against the holder, claimants, possessors or occupants of such lands.[19] All claimants are compelled to act and present their answers otherwise they lose their right to own their property.[20] The purpose is to serve public interest by requiring that the titles to the lands "be settled and adjudicated."[21] Notice of the filing of the petition is published in the Official Gazette.[22] During the trial, conflicting claims are presented and the court adjudicates ownership in favor of one of the claimants.[23] When the decision becomes final, the court orders the issuance of the decree of registration which, in turn, becomes the basis for the issuance of a certificate of title.[24]