This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2009-10-02 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| 2. Determination by the court of the just compensation for the property sought to be taken.[4] | |||||
|
2005-12-19 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| Section 2 of Rule 67 categorically prescribes the amount to be deposited with the authorized government depositary as the pre-condition for the issuance of a writ of possession. This is the assessed value of the property for purposes of taxation. The figure is exact and permits the court no discretion in determining what the provisional value should be.[97] | |||||