You're currently signed in as:
User

BIBLIA TOLEDO-BANAGA v. COURT OF APPEALS

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

2009-12-18
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
xxx To once again re-open that issue through a different avenue would defeat the existence of our courts as final arbiters of legal controversies. Having attained finality, the decision is beyond review or modification even by this Court (Toledo-Banaga v. Court of Appeals) [62].
2006-06-30
TINGA, J.
Litigation commenced once again when private respondent elevated the case to the Court of Appeals via a petition for certiorari and mandamus.[6]  The Court of Appeals' Decision,[7] which was affirmed by this Court in its decision in G.R. No. 127941[8] promulgated on January 28, 1999, directed the Register of Deeds to issue certificates of title in the name of private respondent and the trial court to issue a writ of execution and a writ of possession in favor of respondent. The dispositive portion of the Court of Appeals' decision, as affirmed by this Court, reads:
2003-07-03
CARPIO, J.
The registration by the Loys of their contracts of sale did not defeat the right of prior buyers because the person who signed the Loys' contracts was not the registered owner. The registered owner of Lot Nos. 5 and 6 was the "Estate of Jose Vaño." Teodoro Vaño was the seller in the contract of sale with Alfredo Loy, Jr. The Estate of Jose Vaño was the seller in the contract of sale with Teresita Loy. Teodoro Vaño signed both contracts of sale. The rule is well-settled that "one who buys from a person who is not the registered owner is not a purchaser in good faith."[39] As held in Toledo-Banaga v. Court of Appeals:[40]