You're currently signed in as:
User

LOURDES FLOR v. MUNICIPAL JUDGE NICANOR J. CRUZ

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2011-06-22
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
Atty. Bautista also questioned Judge Causapin's impartiality considering that (1) Judge Causapin was seen having a drinking spree with Jose T. Bautista, one of the defendants in Civil Case No. 1387-G, as attested to by Delia Ronquillo in an Affidavit dated October 16, 2006; [7] and (2) Judge Causapin and Jose Bautista, the other defendant in Civil Case No. 1387-G, are both active members of the Masonic Organization and drink together regularly. [8]
2011-06-22
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
On November 22, 2006, while the OCA was still awaiting Judge Causapin's comment to Atty. Baustista's complaint, said judge issued in Civil Case No. 1387-G a Resolution of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order dated September 18, 2006, [10] wherein he clarified his reasons for dismissing Civil Case No. 1387-G: The unsigning of the Verification and Certification of Non-Forum Shopping is the reason for the dismissal of the case without prejudice.