This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2011-09-14 |
DEL CASTILLO, J. |
||||
| With regard to petitioner's denial of the receipt of the demand letter dated July 29, 2002, we believe that this did not overturn the presumption of regularity that the letter was delivered and received by the addressee in the regular course of the mail considering that respondent was able to present the postmaster's certification[63] stating that the letter was indeed sent to the address of petitioner. Bare denial of receipt of a mail cannot prevail over the certification of the postmaster, whose official duty is to send notices of registered mail.[64] | |||||