Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR NO. 146006 2005-04-22	JOSE C. LEE v. RTC OF QUEZON CITY CORONA, J.
… Considerable time has already elapsed and, to serve the ends of justice, it is time that [the] controversy is finally laid to rest. "Sound practice seeks to accommodate the theory which avoids waste of time, effort and expense, both to the parties and the government, not to speak of delay in the disposal of the case. A marked characteristic of our judicial set-up is that where the dictates of justice so demand ... the Supreme Court should act, and act with finality." In this case, the dictates of justice do demand that this Court act, and act with finality.[27]
	GR No. 149717 2003-10-07	EASTERN ASSURANCE v. LAND TRANSPORTATION FRANCHISING PANGANIBAN, J.
Further, petitioner argues that the LTFRB's haste in accrediting PAMI and PAIC II is an indication of grave abuse of discretion. However, since the two-group system was to take effect starting March 1, 2001, accrediting the two groups on February 28, 2001 was not unreasonable. In the absence of contrary evidence, we must uphold the presumption of regularity in the performance of duties by public officers.[18]