Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR NO. 145742 2005-08-14	PHILIPPINE PORTS AUTHORITY v. CIPRES STEVEDORING CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
As for respondent's claim that PPA AO No. 03-2000 violated the constitutional provision of non-impairment of contract, suffice it to state here that all contracts are "subject to the overriding demands, needs, and interests of the greater number as the State may determine in the legitimate exercise of its police power."[52]
	GR No. 145742 2005-07-14	PHILIPPINE PORTS AUTHORITY v. CIPRES STEVEDORING CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
As for respondent's claim that PPA AO No. 03-2000 violated the constitutional provision of non-impairment of contract, suffice it to state here that all contracts are "subject to the overriding demands, needs, and interests of the greater number as the State may determine in the legitimate exercise of its police power."[52]