Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

	GR NO. 150253 2006-11-30	DAVAO LIGHT v. ANTONIO G. DIAZ CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
On 8 June 1992, the ERB granted the petition for the institution of refund proceedings.[16] Petitioner's motion for reconsideration of this decision was denied by the ERB on 1 July 1992 and thereafter, it filed a petition for review before the Court of Appeals.[17] On 22 July 1996, the Court of Appeals rendered its decision stating, among other things, the following:Notwithstanding the foregoing, We still recognize private respondents' right to a refund inasmuch as the rates charged them, in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Tesorero v. Mathay, were excessive.