Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

	GR NO. 136388 2006-03-14	ANICIA RAMOS-ANDAN v. PEOPLE SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.
The Solicitor General counters that this issue is not novel, having long been resolved by this Court in Zagado v. Court of Appeals,[3] thus:The contention of the petitioner that he did not commit estafa because he did not issue or indorse the postdated checks is devoid of merit. While it is true that he did not issue or indorse the postdated checks, his and Montuerto's concerted acts with common design and purpose in encashing the questioned checks indicate the presence of conspiracy as charged in the information filed against them.