You're currently signed in as:
User

BELLA S.D. UY v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2001-06-20
PER CURIAM
In this case, the investigating judge found that, with the exception of Criminal Case No. 78745, respondent judge failed to order the payment of confiscated money to the government in the criminal cases mentioned in the anonymous letter.[10] Respondent judge cannot be excused on the ground that the bet money was not always turned over to his court by the Office of the City Prosecutor.[11] It was his duty to see to it that the money was turned over to his court and then ordered by him to be paid to the government.