This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2012-07-04 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| Suspension under R.A. No. 3019 being a mere preventive measure whose duration shall in no case exceed ninety (90) days,[55] the adequacy of the opportunity to contest the validity of the information and of the proceedings that preceded its filing vis-à-vis the merits of the defenses of the accused cannot be measured alone by the absence or presence of an actual hearing. An opportunity to be heard on one's defenses, however unmeritorious it may be, against the suspension mandated by law equally and sufficiently serves both the due process right of the accused and the mandatory nature of the suspension required by law. | |||||
|
2007-11-28 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| In Resolution No. 330,[8] dated March 20, 1989, the Cebu City Sangguniang Panlungsod approved the reconveyance to Isagani Figuracion, successor-in-interest of Galileo Figuracion, of an unused portion of Lot No. 899-D-2, designated as Lot No. 899-D-2-A (subject lot), consisting of 84 sq. m. On the basis thereof, Cebu City Mayor Tomas Osmena (Mayor Osmena) executed in favor of Isagani Figuracion a deed of sale[9] dated April 12, 1989 over the subject lot for the price of P40,000.00. TCT No. 49454 in the name of Cebu City was canceled,[10] and in lieu thereof, TCT No. 113746[11] was issued in the name of Isagani Figuracion, and TCT No. 113747, in the name of Cebu City,[12] over the remaining portion of Lot No. 899-D-2. | |||||