This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-09-27 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| An employer cannot be compelled to continue with the employment of an employee guilty of misfeasance or malfeasance, whose continuance in the service of the employer is clearly inimical to its interest. The law in protecting the rights of workers authorizes neither the oppression nor self- destruction of employer.[39] | |||||