This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-04-24 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| In determining whether the husband is a stranger to the suit, the character of the property must be taken into account. In Mariano v. Court of Appeals,[11] which was later adopted in Spouses Ching v. Court of Appeals,[12] this Court held that the husband of the judgment debtor cannot be deemed a "stranger" to the case prosecuted and adjudged against his wife for an obligation that has redounded to the benefit of the conjugal partnership.[13] On the other hand, in Naguit v. Court of Appeals[14] and Sy v. Discaya,[15] the Court stated that a spouse is deemed a stranger to the action wherein the writ of execution was issued and is therefore justified in bringing an independent action to vindicate her right of ownership over his exclusive or paraphernal property. | |||||
|
2006-07-12 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| On 25 June 1996, the DARAB Head Office, Quezon City, rendered a Decision[22] on DARAB Case No. 1283, dismissing the Appeal of petitioners Berbosos and affirming the Decision of the DARAB Region III dated 18 December 1989, ordering as follows: | |||||