This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-05-16 |
PUNO, J. |
||||
| Petitioners were also not denied due process, as they were given sufficient opportunity to be heard on the issue of ownership.[33] The essence of due process in administrative proceedings is simply an opportunity to explain one's side or an opportunity to seek reconsideration of the action or ruling complained of.[34] And there is nothing in the records which would suggest that petitioners had absolute lack of opportunity to be heard.[35] Obviously, the choice not to present evidence was made by petitioners themselves.[36] | |||||