This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2008-10-17 |
REYES, R.T., J. |
||||
| Here, We grant petitioner separation pay equivalent to one-half (1/2) month's pay for every year of service.[104] It should include regular allowances which he might have been receiving.[105] We are not blind to the fact that he was not dismissed for any serious misconduct or to any act which would reflect on his moral character. We also recognize that his employment with PAL lasted for more or less a decade. | |||||
|
2008-07-21 |
REYES, R.T., J. |
||||
| In Planters Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Commission,[52] the petitioning employees were given termination benefits based on their basic salary. However, Planters Products, Inc. had integrated the allowances of its remaining employees into their basic salary. Thus, it was the basic salary that increased. Also, it was the basic salary as increased (not the basic salary and allowances) which still formed the basis for the computation of the termination benefits of the remaining employees of the company. The Court held that fairness demanded that the terminated employees receive the same treatment.[53] Clearly, such situation is absent here. | |||||