You're currently signed in as:
User

SOLID HOMES v. TERESITA PAYAWAL

This case has been cited 6 times or more.

2013-02-26
PERALTA, J.
Respondents then sought recourse before the CA alleging grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of the NLRC in ruling in favor of the petitioner,[16] which case was docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 84811.
2010-07-05
VILLARAMA, JR., J.
Petitioners are government personnel since they are employed by an agency attached to the AFP. Consequently, as correctly observed by the Court of Appeals, the Labor Arbiter's decision on their complaint for illegal dismissal cannot be made to stand since the same was issued without jurisdiction. Any decision issued without jurisdiction is a total nullity, and may be struck down at any time.[32]
2005-09-23
Any decision rendered without jurisdiction is a total nullity and may be struck down at any time, even on appeal before this Court; the only exception is when the party raising the issue is barred by estoppel which is not so in this case.[23]
2004-04-14
PANGANIBAN, J.
The general rule is that any decision rendered without jurisdiction is a total nullity and may be struck down at any time, even on appeal before this Court.[21] Indeed, the question of jurisdiction may be raised at any time, provided that such action would not result in the mockery of the tenets of fair play.[22] As an exception to the rule, the issue may not be raised if the party is barred by estoppel.[23]
2004-04-14
PANGANIBAN, J.
The general rule is that any decision rendered without jurisdiction is a total nullity and may be struck down at any time, even on appeal before this Court.[21] Indeed, the question of jurisdiction may be raised at any time, provided that such action would not result in the mockery of the tenets of fair play.[22] As an exception to the rule, the issue may not be raised if the party is barred by estoppel.[23]
2004-03-30
PANGANIBAN, J.
It is settled that any decision rendered without jurisdiction is a total nullity and may be struck down at any time, even on appeal before this Court.[25] Indeed, the general rule is that a question of jurisdiction may be raised at any time, provided that doing so does not result in the mockery of the tenets of fair play.[26] An exception to this rule arises when the party is barred by estoppel, in which case the issue of jurisdiction may not be raised.[27]