Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 183802 2009-09-17	ALEXANDER TAM WONG v. CATHERINE FACTOR-KOYAMA CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
It is well-established that a summons upon a respondent or a defendant must be served by handing a copy thereof to him in person or, if he refuses to receive it, by tendering it to him. Personal service of summons most effectively ensures that the notice desired under the constitutional requirement of due process is accomplished.[35] The essence of personal service is the handing or tendering of a copy of the summons to the defendant himself.[36]
	GR No. 177007 2009-07-14	SANSIO PHILIPPINES v. SPS. ALICIA CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
It is well-established that summons upon a respondent or a defendant must be served by handing a copy thereof to him in person or, if he refuses to receive it, by tendering it to him. Personal service of summons most effectively ensures that the notice desired under the constitutional requirement of due process is accomplished.[29] The essence of personal service is the handing or tendering of a copy of the summons to the defendant himself,[30] wherever he may be found; that is, wherever he may be, provided he is in the Philippines.[31]
	GR NO. 163584 2006-12-12	REMELITA M. ROBINSON v. CELITA B. MIRALLES SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.
[10] Paluwagan ng Bayan Savings Bank v. King, G.R. No. 78252, April 12, 1989, 172 SCRA 60, citing Keister v. Navarro, supra, Arevalo v. Quilatan, 116 SCRA 700 (1982).