You're currently signed in as:
User

GELMART INDUSTRIES v. VICENTE LEOGARDO

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2008-12-24
CARPIO MORALES, J.
In the present case, the records on hand show that the lone piece of evidence submitted by petitioner to substantiate his claim of constructive dismissal is an unsigned copy of the Kasunduan. This falls way short of the required quantum of proof which, as the appellate court pointed out, is substantial evidence,[24] or such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.[25]