This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2011-09-05 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| As branch manager, Lopez clearly occupies a "position of trust." His hold on his position and his stay in the service depend on the employer's trust and confidence in him and on his managerial services.[27] According to the bank, Lopez betrayed this trust and confidence when he issued the subject POs without authority and despite the express directive to put the client's application on hold. In response, Lopez insists that he had sufficient authority to act as he did, as this authority is inherent in his position as bank manager. He points to his record in the past when he issued POs which were honored and paid by the bank and which constituted the arbiter's "overwhelming evidence"[28] in support of the finding that "complainant's dismissal from work was without just cause, hence, illegal."[29] | |||||
|
2000-01-27 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| Accordingly, the Labor Arbiter ordered:[6] | |||||