You're currently signed in as:
User

JOSE T. TOLENTINO v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2008-12-16
CARPIO MORALES, J.
To the complaint of Celestina and her husband, petitioner contended that, inter alia, the HLURB has no jurisdiction over it by virtue of Section 29[3] of Republic Act 265,[4] as amended by Executive Order No. 289,[5] and that its assets are deemed to be in custodia legis of the receiver to thus exempt them from garnishment, levy, attachment or execution.