This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-12-16 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| To the complaint of Celestina and her husband, petitioner contended that, inter alia, the HLURB has no jurisdiction over it by virtue of Section 29[3] of Republic Act 265,[4] as amended by Executive Order No. 289,[5] and that its assets are deemed to be in custodia legis of the receiver to thus exempt them from garnishment, levy, attachment or execution. | |||||