This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2004-05-19 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| This contention is untenable. The kernel of the right is not against all compulsion, but against testimonial compulsion.[37] The right against self- incrimination is simply against the legal process of extracting from the lips of the accused an admission of guilt. It does not apply where the evidence sought to be excluded is not an incrimination but as part of object evidence. | |||||