Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 167519 2015-01-14	WELLEX GROUP v. U-LAND AIRLINES LEONEN, J.
Suria v. Intermediate Appellate Court is not applicable. In that case, this court specifically stated that the parties entered into a contract of sale, and their reciprocal obligations had already been fulfilled:[186]
	AM NO. RTJ-05-1921 2005-09-30	MA. TERESA H. DE JESUS v. JUDGE RENATO J. DILAG SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J
We sustain the observation of the Court of Appeals[9] that the Order of respondent judge directing the BID to allow the entry of Harlinghausen to this country would effectively countermand the order of detention[10] issued by the BID and "constitutes an intrusion into its prerogatives as regards the entry, admission, exclusion, registration, repatriation, monitoring and deportation of foreigners within our national territory."