This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2002-01-16 |
PARDO, J. |
||||
| In Co Tiamco v. Diaz,[16] we emphasized that "the principle underlying the brevity and simplicity of pleadings in forcible entry and unlawful detainer cases rests upon considerations of public policy." "Cases of forcible entry and detainer are summary in nature for they involve perturbation of social order which may be restored as promptly as possible, and, accordingly, technicalities or details of procedure which may cause unnecessary delays should be carefully avoided.[17] Such cases are designed to provide for an expeditious means of protecting actual possession or the right to possession of the property involved."[18] | |||||