This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2015-03-16 |
REYES, J. |
||||
| Settled is the rule that when one is arbitrarily and unjustly deprived of his job or means of livelihood, the action instituted to contest the legality of one's dismissal from employment constitutes, in essence, an action predicated upon an injury to the rights of the plaintiff, as contemplated under Article 1146[35] of the New Civil Code, which must be brought within four years.[36] | |||||
|
2014-08-13 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
| In Callanta v. Carnation Philippines, Inc.,[50] Virgilio Callanta worked as a salesperson for Carnation Philippines, Inc. beginning in January 1974. On June 1, 1979, Carnation filed with the Regional Office No. X of the then Ministry of Labor and Employment an application for issuance of clearance to terminate Callanta. The application was granted, and Callanta's employment was declared terminated effective June 1, 1979.[51] | |||||
|
2009-02-10 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| The law fixes the period of time within which petitioner could seek remedy for his illegal dismissal and for as long as he filed his Complaint within the prescriptive period, he shall be entitled to the full protection of his right to backwages. In illegal dismissal cases, the employee concerned is given a period of four years from the time of his illegal dismissal within which to institute the complaint. This is based on Article 1146 of the New Civil Code which states that actions based upon an injury to the rights of the plaintiff must be brought within four years.[19] The four-year prescriptive period shall commence to run only upon the accrual of a cause of action of the worker.[20] Here, petitioner was dismissed from service on 15 September 2001. He filed his complaint for illegal dismissal on 14 June 2004. Clearly, then, the instant case was filed within the prescriptive period. | |||||