This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2000-11-22 |
DE LEON, JR., J. |
||||
| The reason for the abovecited rule is that the testimony of a co-conspirator proceeds from a polluted source. It must be received with caution because, as is usual with human nature, a culprit, confessing a crime, is likely to put the blame as far as possible on others rather than himself.[20] | |||||
|
2000-08-23 |
DE LEON, JR., J. |
||||
| crime, is likely to put the blame as far as possible on others rather than himself.[25] By way of exception, the testimony of a co-conspirator may, even if uncorroborated, be sufficient as when it is shown to be sincere in itself, because given unhesitatingly and in a straightforward manner, and is full of details which by their nature could not have been the | |||||
|
2000-06-23 |
DE LEON, JR., J. |
||||
| crime, is likely to put the blame as far as possible on others rather than himself.[25] By way of exception, the testimony of a co-conspirator may, even if uncorroborated, be sufficient as when it is shown to be sincere in itself, because given unhesitatingly and in a straightforward manner, and is full of details which by their nature could not have been the | |||||