Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 175851 2012-07-04	EMILIA LIM v. MINDANAO WINES DEL CASTILLO, J.
Despite her acquittal from the charges of violation of Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 (BP 22) or the Bouncing Checks Law, the lower courts still found petitioner Emilia Lim (Emilia) civilly liable and ordered her to pay the value of the bounced checks, a ruling which was upheld by the Court of Appeals (CA) in its June 30, 2006 Decision[1] and November 9, 2006 Resolution[2] in CA-G.R. SP No. 64897.
	GR NO. 167177 2006-09-27	ESTRELLA S. BAÑEZ v. DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
The University correctly suspended Bañez and Cantillas during the pendency of the administrative investigation. Where the continued employment of an employee poses a serious and imminent threat to the life and property of the employer or his co-employees, preventive suspension is proper.[34] This is especially so where, as here, the employee repeatedly committed acts of misconduct and willful breach of trust.