This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-04-06 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| On 12 October 1995, Tirona filed a motion with leave to amend defendant's answer.[8] She alleged that she filed her answer without the assistance of a lawyer due to fear that she might be unable to file the required pleading on time. In her amended answer, Tirona maintained that Ocampo is not the owner of the subject land. She stated that the certificate of title to the subject land is not even registered under Ocampo's name. Tirona also alleged that she has a right of first refusal in case of sale of the land, pursuant to Presidential Decree ("PD") Nos. 1517,[9] 1893[10] and 1968.[11] The area where the subject land is located was certified as an area under priority development.[12] Tirona asked for attorney's fees and moral and exemplary damages. | |||||