This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2014-07-09 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| In Basbas v. Sayson,[12] the Court pointed out that even just one of the co-owners, by himself alone, can bring an action for the recovery of the co-owned property, even through an action for revival of judgment, because the enforcement of the judgment would result in such recovery of property. Thus, as in Basbas, it is not necessary in this case that all of the parties, in whose favor the case for partition was adjudged, be made plaintiffs to the action for revival of judgment. Any which one of said prevailing parties, who had an interest in the enforcement of the decision, may file the complaint for revival of judgment, even just by himself. | |||||