You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

TOMASA VDA. DE JACOB v. RICARDO C. PUNO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 154992
2008-02-13
HARRY G. LIM Petitioner v. ANIANO DESIERTO
VELASCO JR., J.
Lastly, petitioner's claim that the Memorandum of August 23, 2001 is incomplete and inadequate compared with Corral's Resolution is untenable. Her Resolution was passed upon by the proper reviewing officers. Petitioner cannot validly insist that Corral's findings should be upheld against the findings of Ombudsman, who, needless to stress, has the power of supervision and control over the investigating officers.[15]